observer feels the art fills and enhances
¤%%link;;{½3;
it is the observer that is in the center
¤%%link;;{½3;
in this sense, the artist _becomes_ less important
¤%%link;;{½3;
art is a one-to-many relation - being redefined in each
¤%%link;;{½3;
but there is always seed for what becomes
¤%%link;;{½3;
the observer temporarily becomes somebody else
¤%%link;;{½3;
the art becomes part of the observer in the moment of experience
¤%%link;;{½3;
and a kind of linking happens between artist and observer
¤%%link;;{½3;
'experiencer'
¤%%link;;{½3;
'audience'
¤%%link;;{½3;
'consumer'
¤%%link;;{½3;
also makes sense as the 'observer' is co-creator in the moment of experiencing
¤%%link;;{½3;
and makes sense, as art, in its extreme, can be created by and for a single entity
¤%%link;;{½3;
'coartist' - as in 'codomain' for mathematical functions
¤%%link;;{½3;
alternatives could be
¤%%link;;{½3;
I don't like the distance that the word 'observer' suggests, but went with it
¤%%link;;{½3;
art can express the mode and feelings of the observer
¤%%link;;{½3;
24 thoughts left